"Climate Change"
"Global Warming"

(cue menacing music)

These are words our neo-comm, socialist, eco-fascist opponents use to describe something that has been happening on this planet, for all practical purposes, for ETERNITY without our direction or intervention. 

At some point, the eco-fascists decided that they could pretend that "conservation" meant "preserving the status quo".
This dangerous attitude ignores a few milennia of human experience, and virtually all the scientific knowledge available to man. 

THINGS CHANGE - ALL THE TIME.
Since when does the environment stay the same? Utah used to be underwater. Alaska used to be the eastern steppes of Siberia. There used to be ICE covering North America, down to somewhere near North Carolina.
(according to our scientist friends)

When I was a kid, I grew up on a nature "preserve" (literally). I learned all the trails by heart, I played in the forests every day (not making this up).
Then one year, there was a hurricane. It rained for a long time, really hard, and the streams on the hills above the preserve flooded. This washed out a large section of the trails I loved so much, and completely changed the geography of the preserve, in about 36 hours. 
The old pond where we caught frogs and snakes was gone. The direction of the stream changed. There was a new pool at the base of the waterfall. In a place where previously there was only frogs and minnow, now we had some honest to god BASS. I got to FISH in a stream that wasn't there 2 days before.

And I learned a big lesson. Nature changes. That change is natural. Nothing we can do can prevent it.
It's like...
EVOLUTION.

Let's hit them back in the language war. Lets start referring to changes in the weather over the long term as "CLIMATE EVOLUTION" (which, after all is perfectly natural. And everything natural is good, Right? ).

Ask Democrats why they are opposed to "climate evolution"? It's just nature... 

Climate Evolution has been happening for milennia.  It will continue with or without us. 

Take back the language. Our opponents started it.

Today I have been inundated with news stories about this global warming conference, carefully timed to coincide with articles about Bush forcing spin onto the "scientists" involved.  
One recent article, in discussing this upcoming "report" boasted that the number of computer models they used to predict the future climate change had increased threefold. (up to something like 17 from 6, whatever)

Frankly, the use of computer modeling to predict anything much past next week is something they won't even do on the Weather Channel, so why some of the same people feel ok about making sweeping generalizations about future global climate based on what a computer "tells" them. Artificial Intelligence, btw, is hardly more than a theory, so computers can still, at this point in history, only tell us what WE TELL THEM TO TELL US. (basic programming, 101, computers don't make decisions, people do)
If any computer scientist can tell me I'm wrong, I will gladly offer a retraction. But I'm really not holding my breath here. 

Saying that 17 computers told you it was going to rain is no more valid than saying one did.
Picture this headline:
14 idiots think I'm right...(up 12 from last week). That 700 percent increase in support from idiots doesn't do much for my confidence, thanks.

I live in New York City. The temperature in a 10 mile radius varies by as much as 5 degrees on any given day, at any given time. So, riddle me this... if these doomsayers are saying that 2 degrees will raise sea level 50 feet, then why am I not wet right now? The temperature went up and down 15 degrees in ONE DAY today. So 2 degrees over 100 years is going to KILL US? Please.

More later, if I can bear to think more on this... I can't believe the republicans and businessman are preparing to cave in on this. It should be an easy fight. PROVE SOMETHING... what's that? NO PROOF? A computer model? I have a computer model that lets me pretend to be an elf in a magical land and slay dragons... What else do you want to pretend today?

The fact that we allow the other party to call themselves "democrats" is a travesty. It permits the uneducated to arrive at the false conclusion that Republicans do not believe in democracy. We should call them what they are, neo-comms or socialists.

The fact that the "liberals" have been permitted to advance an agenda based on SEEMING to care for minorities while simultaneously promoting policies which consistently slow their progress and ability to function and thrive in society is MINDBLOWING to me. 

Promoting racial quotas and lowered standards under the guise of "opportunity" is a false promise. We are faced with an entire generation of people who have been raised thinking they are owed something by the government they pay for. Who have yet to make the connection between their own tax payments and the federal budget.  And these same people are taught in school how great democracy is (true) and then when they get to vote, they are forced to choose... Democratic or NOT Democratic ... since Democracy is good, then Democrats must be good...
So simple. Yet so powerful. All it takes is a comprehensive and thorough misunderstanding of what the parties actually stand for and a lack of education in basic economics below the college level...